Editorial Feature

Automation in Nutritional Testing: How Technology is Improving Accuracy, Efficiency, and Compliance

The food industry is under pressure to do more, and do it better. From food safety and labeling to traceability and compliance, there’s a growing need for smarter, faster ways to get things done. Nutritional content testing, a critical part of quality control and product labeling, is one area where automation is starting to make a big difference.

Clean and fresh gala apples on a conveyor belt in a fruit packaging warehouse for presize.

Image Credit: Paula Cobleigh/Shutterstock.com

Manual testing methods are slow and prone to error. But now, with tools powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI), robotics, and connected software, labs can test for nutrients, allergens, and contaminants with more speed and consistency.

Let's look into how automation is really reshaping food testing—from the tech behind it to real-world use cases.

Download your PDF copy now!

Key Technologies Behind the Shift

Automation isn’t about replacing lab staff—it’s about making routine processes faster, more accurate, and easier to scale. A mix of advanced tools is making all of that possible.

AI and Machine Learning (ML)

AI and ML arguably form the backbone of modern automated nutrient analysis. 

AI models are getting really good at analyzing food data. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), for instance, can classify food images, spot contaminants, and estimate serving sizes. Pre-trained models like ResNet or EfficientNet, trained on food-specific datasets, are already being used to recognize different cuisines or flag issues in low-sodium labeling.

Transfer learning helps these systems adapt to niche tasks—like detecting spoilage or verifying label claims. Reinforcement learning fine-tunes the testing process by adjusting conditions (like reagent amounts or incubation times) based on what’s happening in real time.1,2

Spectroscopy and Hyperspectral Imaging

For quick, non-destructive testing, NIR (near-infrared) and hyperspectral imaging tools are increasingly being used to measure things like moisture, fat, and protein levels.

A good example is PerkinElmer’s in-line NIR systems in dairy processing. They continuously monitor product quality without slowing down the line. Hyperspectral cameras, combined with machine learning, can also detect nutrient shortfalls in crops or spot allergens in finished goods. These systems are fast, reliable, and more accurate than manual testing and are especially useful for plant-based foods where maintaining consistent protein levels is vital for gaining consumer trust.1,3

Helping Ensure Quality and Safety at Every Step in Cheese Processing

Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

Nutrient and contaminant testing is also getting faster thanks to automated chromatography and mass spectrometry setups. Liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectrometry (MS) systems now use robotic sample prep to limit human handling and reduce contamination risks.

These methods are used to find pesticide residues in grains or verify omega-3 levels in drinks—helping food producers stay compliant with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Union (EU) regulations. They also help confirm clean-label claims, like “no artificial preservatives.”1,4

Robotics and Lab Management Software

Many tasks in food testing labs are repetitive, time-consuming, and sensitive to human error. Robotics and automation software are now handling these processes more efficiently. Robotic arms are used to perform routine tasks like pipetting, diluting samples, and adjusting pH levels with high precision.

These systems are often integrated with Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS), which organize testing schedules, track samples throughout the process, and generate audit-ready reports. This setup not only speeds up workflows but also helps labs catch issues early. For example, if histamine levels in seafood samples are too high, the system can flag the issue before products leave the facility.3,4 This kind of integration helps labs handle large volumes of tests without compromising precision.

Where Automation is Being Used

Automation in nutritional testing isn’t limited to one corner of the food system. It’s touching nearly every point in the supply chain—from how ingredients are analyzed in labs to how crops are monitored in the field. As these technologies mature, they’re not just speeding things up—they’re shifting how decisions are made, how risk is managed, and how value is created.

1. Smarter Nutrient Analysis

AI-powered platforms are changing how nutrition data is interpreted. These systems go beyond static label creation—they pull from multiple data streams (like imaging, chromatography, and historical batch data) to identify patterns, anomalies, and even potential regulatory red flags.

In high-throughput environments, this means teams can flag inconsistencies before a product reaches packaging. In smaller operations, it means faster turnaround without sacrificing accuracy.5,6

The consumer side is evolving too. Personalized nutrition platforms, like Spoon Guru, now use small language models to scan ingredient data and tailor food recommendations to specific health needs. This bridges lab testing and end-user dietary compliance—something that used to exist in two entirely separate spheres. In early studies, these tools have significantly improved adherence to dietary plans, showing the potential for AI to drive not just efficiency but health outcomes.5,6

2. Allergen Detection and Batch Traceability

Automated allergen detection is solving a long-standing industry challenge in terms of being able to identify contamination in real-time without disrupting production flow. Traditional batch testing required pulling samples and waiting on lab results. Today’s hyperspectral imaging systems and machine vision can scan product lines continuously, detecting allergens like peanuts or gluten based on spectral signatures or trace particles.

What’s particularly notable is how these tools intersect with traceability tech like blockchain. Once an anomaly is detected, it can be tied to a specific batch, location, or ingredient shipment. This provides a level of forensic traceability that not only helps with recall management but can also inform supplier relationships and contract terms.3,5

This isn’t just about safety—it’s about accountability and data transparency, which are becoming competitive differentiators in food manufacturing.

3. Precision Agriculture

Upstream, automation is transforming the way nutrients are managed in agriculture. Drones, satellites, and AI models are being used to assess plant health and soil composition, identifying nutrient imbalances that aren’t visible to the naked eye.

Instead of applying fertilizer evenly across a field, farmers can now target specific sections that are low in nitrogen or potassium. That improves yield quality and reduces excess runoff—an environmental issue that’s increasingly under regulatory scrutiny.

What’s interesting here is the link between farm-level data and food processing outcomes. As traceability expands, the ability to connect soil nutrient levels to end-product composition (e.g., protein levels in plant-based foods) becomes more realistic. This could redefine quality assurance standards and open up new ways of certifying food origin and nutritional integrity.1

4. Real-Time Quality Control

In processing facilities, automation is allowing for a shift from reactive to proactive quality control. With sensors embedded in production lines, changes in nutrient content—like moisture loss during drying or fat content during frying—can be monitored continuously.

Instead of running tests after the batch is complete, adjustments happen in real time. This not only prevents waste and ensures consistency, but it also opens the door for iterative product development. Teams can test minor changes in formulation or cooking parameters with immediate feedback, shortening R&D cycles and reducing the risk of quality failures.7

It’s a quiet shift, but an important one, as labs are no longer just quality checkpoints—they’re becoming strategic inputs into innovation and product differentiation.

5. Smarter Supply Chains

Automation is also improving how food moves through the system, especially in areas that have historically struggled with visibility and timing. Robotic process automation (RPA) and predictive inventory systems are now being used to balance stock levels, anticipate demand surges, and trigger restocks before shortages occur.

In cold chain environments, autonomous vehicles and smart sensors are ensuring that perishable goods are stored and shipped under optimal conditions. Real-time temperature tracking isn’t new—but what’s changing is how that data is now connected directly to QA systems, flagging shipments that may have been compromised before they even reach the loading dock.

The result is a supply chain that’s not just more efficient, but also more responsive and self-correcting. This reduces waste, cuts operational risk, and helps companies meet increasingly strict sustainability targets.8

Real-World Case Studies

The impact of automation isn’t hypothetical—it’s already happening:

  • BioSystems Y15: By automating lactose testing, a dairy producer cut testing time by 70 %, reducing label errors and avoiding penalties. This also freed up staff to focus on higher-level QC tasks.9

  • PerkinElmer NIR: A cereal company used NIR tools to monitor protein and fiber content in real time. This reduced ingredient waste by 15 % and helped maintain consistency for health-conscious consumers.10

  • Food Lab, Inc.: Using AI-driven labeling software, Food Lab produces FDA-compliant nutrition labels in less than 24 hours. This has streamlined client timelines and improved accuracy in allergen and calorie declarations.11

What connects all of these examples isn’t just automation—it’s integration. The value comes from connecting data sources, automating decisions, and closing the loop between testing, production, and labeling.

Challenges and What’s Next

Automation’s progress hasn’t been without roadblocks. One of the biggest challenges is dataset diversity. Many AI models have been trained on limited food types—mostly Western, highly structured products. Mixed dishes, regional ingredients, or variable formats (like stews or sauces) often fall outside their effective range.

Small and mid-sized labs also face financial and staffing barriers. Equipment costs can be high, and training personnel to manage and maintain these systems takes time. Legacy infrastructure also adds complexity, especially when trying to retrofit older systems with modern tools.

There’s also the issue of regulatory fragmentation. Nutritional claims that pass in one country might not in another. For example, what qualifies as “low fat” can differ by up to 20 % between the U.S. and EU.1,2,6 That complicates automation workflows built around fixed compliance rules.

Looking ahead, several trends could ease these barriers. Portable NIR devices and app-based soil testing are already making advanced analysis more accessible to small producers. Predictive models are being used to forecast nutrient degradation, helping teams set dynamic expiration dates tied to temperature and humidity conditions.

Quantum computing may eventually play a role, especially in reducing the processing time of complex spectral data. But in the near term, collaboration will matter more—between AI engineers, nutrition scientists, and policy experts—to build more inclusive, adaptable systems that work across food types, regions, and testing environments.1,3,5

Final Take

Automation in nutritional testing is no longer about optimizing isolated tasks. It’s becoming a connective layer across the entire food system—linking the farm to the lab to the consumer. Whether it's improving nutrient precision, detecting allergens, or keeping supply chains aligned, the shift toward smarter, more integrated systems is already underway.

As these tools continue to evolve and scale, they’re not just helping food companies work faster, they’re helping them work smarter, with better data and more confidence in every decision.

Download your PDF copy now!

Want to Learn More?

If you're looking to build on these ideas or explore related topics, here are a few areas worth digging into next:

References and Further Reading

  1. Liu, Z. et al. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Food Safety: A Decade Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Foods, 12(6), 1242. DOI:10.3390/foods12061242. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/12/6/1242
  2. Bruno, V., Resende, S., & Juan, C. (2017). A Survey on Automated Food Monitoring and Dietary Management Systems. Journal of Health & Medical Informatics, 8(3), 272. DOI:10.4172/2157-7420.1000272. https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/2157-7420-8-272.pdf
  3. Saha, D., Padhiary, M., & Chandrakar, N. (2025). AI vision and machine learning for enhanced automation in food industry: A systematic review. Food and Humanity, 4, 100587. DOI:10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100587. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949824425000916
  4. Utilization of Automation in the Contemporary Food Testing Laboratory. Food Safety. https://www.food-safety.com/articles/4917-utilization-of-automation-in-the-contemporary-food-testing-laboratory
  5. McCarthy, D. I. (2025). Nutritional intelligence in the food system: Combining food, health, data and AI expertise. Nutrition Bulletin, 50(1), 142. DOI:10.1111/nbu.12729. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nbu.12729
  6. Li, X., Yin, A., Choi, H. Y., Chan, V., & Chen, J. (2024). Evaluating the Quality and Comparative Validity of Manual Food Logging and Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Food Image Recognition in Apps for Nutrition Care. Nutrients, 16(15), 2573. DOI:10.3390/nu16152573. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/16/15/2573
  7. Mavani, N. R. et al. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Food Industry—a Guideline. Food Engineering Reviews. DOI:10.1007/s12393-021-09290-z. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12393-021-09290-z
  8. Use Cases for Automation in Food Manufacturing & Distributing. PiF Technologies. https://www.piftechnologies.com/use-cases-for-automation-in-food-manufacturing-distributing/
  9. BioSystems Y15 Automated Multi Parameter Food Analyser. QCL Food Science. https://www.qclscientific.com/biosystems-automated-food-analysers/
  10. Agriculture & Food|PerkinElmer. PerkinElmer | Science with Purpose. https://www.perkinelmer.com/category/agriculture-food
  11. Nutritional Analysis & Food Label Nutrition Facts | FDA Compliant Nutrition Labels | Food Lab. Nutritional Analysis and Food Label Nutrition Facts. https://foodlab.com/

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Ankit Singh

Written by

Ankit Singh

Ankit is a research scholar based in Mumbai, India, specializing in neuronal membrane biophysics. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry and has a keen interest in building scientific instruments. He is also passionate about content writing and can adeptly convey complex concepts. Outside of academia, Ankit enjoys sports, reading books, and exploring documentaries, and has a particular interest in credit cards and finance. He also finds relaxation and inspiration in music, especially songs and ghazals.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Singh, Ankit. (2025, April 09). Automation in Nutritional Testing: How Technology is Improving Accuracy, Efficiency, and Compliance. AZoRobotics. Retrieved on April 12, 2025 from https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=748.

  • MLA

    Singh, Ankit. "Automation in Nutritional Testing: How Technology is Improving Accuracy, Efficiency, and Compliance". AZoRobotics. 12 April 2025. <https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=748>.

  • Chicago

    Singh, Ankit. "Automation in Nutritional Testing: How Technology is Improving Accuracy, Efficiency, and Compliance". AZoRobotics. https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=748. (accessed April 12, 2025).

  • Harvard

    Singh, Ankit. 2025. Automation in Nutritional Testing: How Technology is Improving Accuracy, Efficiency, and Compliance. AZoRobotics, viewed 12 April 2025, https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=748.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.